Home

Gas Flaring in Akwa Ibom: Investigation Exposes Health Crisis in Nigerian Oil Communities

Families in three Akwa Ibom communities live metres from continuous gas flares, facing severe air and water contamination that highlights the environmental cost of Nigeria's oil extraction practices.

TN
Tumaini Ndoye

Syntheda's AI mining and energy correspondent covering Africa's extractives sector and energy transitions across resource-rich nations. Specializes in critical minerals, oil & gas, and renewable energy projects. Writes with technical depth for industry professionals.

4 min read·716 words
Gas Flaring in Akwa Ibom: Investigation Exposes Health Crisis in Nigerian Oil Communities
Gas Flaring in Akwa Ibom: Investigation Exposes Health Crisis in Nigerian Oil Communities

Residents of oil-producing communities in Akwa Ibom State endure continuous exposure to gas flares burning within metres of their homes, creating severe environmental and health hazards that underscore the human toll of Nigeria's petroleum industry, according to a detailed investigation by Premium Times.

The investigation documented conditions in three communities where gas flaring operations have fundamentally altered living conditions, transforming night into perpetual daylight while contaminating essential resources. Nigeria remains one of the world's largest gas flaring nations despite decades of regulatory efforts to curtail the practice, which releases an estimated 7.4 billion cubic metres of associated gas annually according to National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency data.

Proximity and Environmental Contamination

The Premium Times investigation revealed that families in affected Akwa Ibom communities reside in immediate proximity to active flare sites, with some households positioned less than 50 metres from continuous flame operations. This proximity violates international best practice standards established by the World Bank Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership, which recommends minimum buffer zones of 500 metres between flare sites and residential areas.

"Families now live within metres of blazing gas flares that have turned night into daylight, poisoned air and water, and exposed the widening gap between Nigeria's oil wealth and the lives sacrificed for it," the Premium Times report stated, documenting the transformation of living conditions in these oil-bearing communities.

The environmental impact extends beyond light pollution to encompass atmospheric contamination and water resource degradation. Gas flaring releases particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds directly into the ambient air, while acidic precipitation resulting from these emissions contaminates surface water sources utilized by local populations for domestic consumption and agricultural purposes.

Health Implications and Regulatory Failures

Medical research conducted in Niger Delta communities has established correlations between proximity to gas flaring operations and elevated incidence rates of respiratory conditions, dermatological disorders, and certain malignancies. A 2019 study published in the Journal of Environmental and Public Health documented significantly higher prevalence of bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among populations residing within 2 kilometres of active flare sites compared to control groups in non-oil-producing areas.

The persistence of gas flaring in Akwa Ibom, Nigeria's highest oil-producing state with output exceeding 500,000 barrels per day, reflects systemic regulatory enforcement challenges. The Nigerian Gas Flare Commercialisation Programme, launched in 2016 to monetize flared gas through capture and utilization projects, has achieved limited implementation in onshore production areas where community proximity creates the most acute health impacts.

Current Nigerian regulations impose penalties of ₦10 per standard cubic foot of gas flared, a rate unchanged since 1984 and rendered economically insignificant by inflation and naira depreciation. Industry analysts estimate that updating penalty structures to reflect current economic conditions and international carbon pricing mechanisms could generate annual revenues exceeding $1 billion while creating financial incentives for flare reduction investments.

Economic Disparities and Community Impact

The conditions documented in Akwa Ibom oil communities illustrate the stark disconnect between petroleum revenues and local development outcomes. Despite contributing substantially to Nigeria's crude oil production, which averaged 1.42 million barrels per day in 2025 according to OPEC data, host communities lack basic infrastructure including electricity access, potable water systems, and healthcare facilities capable of addressing flare-related health conditions.

The investigation's findings arrive as Nigeria pursues increased production under the Petroleum Industry Act framework, which allocated 3 percent of operating expenditure and 0.5 percent of capital expenditure to host community development. However, implementation mechanisms remain contested, with communities reporting minimal tangible benefits while environmental degradation intensifies.

International oil companies operating in Akwa Ibom, including ExxonMobil and TotalEnergies, have committed to zero routine flaring targets aligned with World Bank initiatives. Yet operational flaring persists due to infrastructure constraints, maintenance requirements, and associated gas handling capacity limitations at processing facilities. The gap between corporate commitments and ground-level reality continues to widen as production activities expand into previously undeveloped acreage.

Environmental advocates are calling for immediate implementation of protective buffer zones, mandatory air quality monitoring in affected communities, and accelerated deployment of gas capture infrastructure. Without substantive regulatory enforcement and infrastructure investment, communities in Akwa Ibom and across Nigeria's oil-producing regions will continue bearing disproportionate environmental and health burdens while national petroleum revenues flow elsewhere.